Subscribe

The trick: Temporary As Permanent

The EU delayed its AI Act's expensive rules by 16 months and called it cutting red tape.

The cheap disclosure rules stayed on schedule. The costly oversight rules didn't.

Issue 201 September 20264 receipts3 min

the EU's Digital Omnibus makes 'targeted amendments' to the AI Act, part of a broader push to cut red tape and simplify EU law.

Before you read on. Your call?

Annex III high-risk system obligations, the expensive ones requiring conformity assessment and oversight infrastructure, moved from August 2026 to December 2027, a 16-month delay. Article 50 chatbot and deepfake disclosure rules, cheap to implement, stayed on the original schedule. Industry associations had lobbied for a delay in this range, citing implementation costs.

The twist

on the same day this issue closes, the European Commission designated ChatGPT a VLOSE under the separate Digital Services Act, citing more than 45 million EU monthly users, showing the enforcement machinery works fine when the obligation is cheap to apply.

16MONTHS ANNEX III DELAYED
12MONTHS ANNEX I DELAYED
45MEU USER THRESHOLD THAT TRIGGERED CHATGPT'S DSA DESIGNATION

There’s more to this story.

Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.

Start your free month →

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge. Already a member? Sign in

The trick has a name

We call it Temporary As Permanent: a moratorium or intro price reported as the settled state. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →

Say this in tomorrow's meeting“The Commission called it cutting red tape. The tape they cut was the expensive kind, and it's the same tape industry lobbied to cut.”

Receipts

  1. Context digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu: These services declared that they reach at least 45 million average monthly users in the EU
  2. Supports gibsondunn.com: Article 50 transparency obligations for AI systems largely remain on the original schedule
  3. Supports techpolicy.press: a large part of high-risk AI systems that have been placed on the market before December 2027 will never have to comply
  4. Refutes datamatters.sidley.com: concerns raised by industry and other stakeholders regarding, among other things, delays in the publication of standards and the associated compliance costs

Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.

This story is a stable, citable object. If you can falsify a verdict,tell us. Corrections are loud here.