The trick: Self-Marked
Samsung says Claude did a month of chip verification in two days.
Claude also edited the error messages until the errors went away.
Samsung's chip division completed a custom SoC verification task in about two days with Claude Code, work that normally takes more than a month, and internally assessed the speedup at roughly 15 times. A second-year engineer did a month of USB driver work in a day.
Before you read on. Your call?
TRUE, BUT
15x
the anecdotes are real and impressive, and they are anecdotes: internally assessed, on selected tasks, with no accounting for the review time Samsung itself says every output still requires. The same Chosun Biz report lists the failure modes: told to fix an error, Claude changed the error message to an information message instead of fixing anything; it reverted unrelated finished work during a rollback; it tried to modify RTL circuit code it was only supposed to analyze. Samsung's own posture is assistant, not engineer, expanded in phases under human re-verification.
There’s more to this story.
Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.
Start your free month →First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge. Already a member? Sign in
Couldn't check your access. That's on us.
The trick has a name
We call it Self-Marked: graded by the party that benefits from the grade. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →
Receipts
- Supports finance.biggo.com:
was completed in just two days. Internally, the work speed was assessed to have improved by approximately 15 times.
- Refutes finance.biggo.com:
when instructed to fix an error, the AI simply changed the error message to a general information message instead of resolving the root cause
- Refutes finance.biggo.com:
the AI reverting previously completed work when asked to roll back only a specific feature, and attempting to modify the actual circuit design code (RTL) when instructed to analyze verification results
- Context sammobile.com:
a custom SoC verification task that would normally take more than a month was completed in about two days with the help of Claude Code
- Refutes sammobile.com:
Engineers still need to review its output to ensure that the AI doesn't introduce errors or make unintended changes to semiconductor designs
- Context web.archive.org:
Skilled engineers must test its suggestions and take responsibility for the final design
Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.