The trick: Moved Ruler
Anthropic's revenue "run rate" just beat OpenAI's by $25 billion.
The two companies don't even count revenue the same way, so nobody actually knows the real gap.
Anthropic's annualized revenue run rate hit $65 billion at the end of July, blowing past OpenAI's reported $40 billion, per Bloomberg reporting both companies fed to their own investors ahead of IPOs.
Before you read on. Your call?
TRUE, BUT
$25b gap
TechCrunch runs the "surges past OpenAI" headline, then admits deep in the piece the companies "may calculate their revenue metrics differently." A revenue tracker that publishes its methodology says why: Anthropic books gross end-customer spend through cloud resellers as revenue, OpenAI reports closer to net. The same tracker puts OpenAI at $24-33 billion, not $40 billion, depending on which number you use.
The twist
Neither company is public. Neither number is audited. Both are run rates, one month annualized, not a year actually earned. The businesses aren't even the same shape: about 85% of Anthropic's revenue is enterprise API contracts, about 85% of OpenAI's is consumer subscriptions. Comparing them head to head is a wholesaler's invoice total against a retailer's subscription count.
There’s more to this story.
Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.
Start your free month →First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge. Already a member? Sign in
Couldn't check your access. That's on us.
The trick has a name
We call it Moved Ruler: two methods, two answers, one of them quoted. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →
Receipts
- Supports techcrunch.com:
Meanwhile, rival OpenAI has doubled its revenue to $40 billion, up from $20 billion at the end of 2025, Bloomberg reported last week.
- Context techcrunch.com:
The two companies may calculate their revenue metrics differently, but Anthropic's growth rate has captivated investors far more than OpenAI's has.
- Refutes aibusiness.vc:
Anthropic books total end-customer spend through cloud resellers as revenue and books partner payouts as expense.
- Refutes aibusiness.vc:
That accounting difference means the top two aren't perfectly apples-to-apples.
- Context web.archive.org:
Approximately 85% of Anthropic's revenue comes from enterprise and developer customers.
- Context web.archive.org:
OpenAI's mix runs in the opposite direction, with roughly 85% tied to ChatGPT consumer subscriptions
Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.